Is it just me, or has this been, like, the most self-righteous-y campaign season of all time? I mean, I realize I’ve only been paying attention to politics since about 1984, but it doesn’t seem like it’s ever been quite this egregiously holier-than-thou. On both sides. And I’m not talking about the candidates (well, except for maybe you, Sarah Palin), either; I’m talking about the good old American people, who seem, on the whole, content to lob allegations of socialism and fascism back and forth like so many fluffy white projectiles in a particularly meaningful rec-room game of Pig Pong.
And I’m going to take this moment to talk to my brothers and sisters on the Left, here, kids, and to say something I’ve been meaning to say for a while but haven’t been quite irritated enough to say until now, and that is:
Lay off the Christians.
For serious, guys. If I have to read one more blog comment about how religious people are ruining the country, I’m seriously going to lose it. And then you’ll have one pissed-off religious lady on your hands. Well, one more.
Listen, I understand your frustration that the Republican Party seems to have been hijacked by hard-right social conservative evangelical Protestants a few years back. That’s frustrating. They don’t represent all Republicans, and it’s really too bad they’ve done such a good job cornering the market on words like “values” and “patriotism” while advocating policies that are nothing like the patriotic values many of the rest of us embrace. That bugs me, too. But you know what doesn’t make it better? Painting all Christians with the same brush.
I’ve been teaching my students about persuasive writing this week, and the most important thing I’ve told them so far is that if you want people to believe your considered opinion is valid, you should provide some provable facts to back up your argument. So here are some facts for you. According to the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, 51% of Americans identify themselves as Protestant. (That includes all Protestant denominations.) 25% of Americans are Catholic. (I’m included in that group.) 3.3% of Americans identify themselves as belonging to other Christian religions, 5% belong to non-Christian religions (Judaism, Hinduism, Islam, Sufism, Jainism, Shinto, what have you), and about 17% of Americans don’t subscribe to any religion at all. Want a visual?
See all the green? That’s the percentage of Americans who identify as Christian. Notice it’s a much larger number than the percentage of Americans who say racist things about Barack Obama.
Fact: Most Americans are religious in some way. Most of those religious Americans are Christians. Nearly eight out of ten American adults identifies as Christian. Does that mean eight out of ten American adults are gay-bashing hatemongers? Do eight out of ten American adults attempt to ban books and suppress freedom of speech? Are eight out of ten American adults hanging on Rush Limbaugh’s every word? (Side Note: Please don’t make me answer my own rhetorical questions.)
Fact: Many religious Americans (from many American religions) vote for progressive candidates. If you look at the “religious vote” in 2004, you can see that not even the evangelical churches delivered 100% of their votes to George W. Bush. And Kerry did fairly well among Catholics despite running a campaign that was something less than awe-inspiring; according to CNS (kind of the AP of the USCCB; oh, boy, do I love acronyms), approximately 47% of Catholics voted for Kerry (as opposed to 48% of the general public). According to the Pew Forum, “there is no religious majority at the ballot box.” (Side Note: You might also take a look at this season’s candidate preference by religion.)
And yet I keep running across the same tired old remarks about Christians, made by people who pride themselves on being open-minded and accepting of diversity. No wonder the Democratic Party is perceived to have a “God problem.” Some of our members obviously do. That’s not to say there aren’t anti-religion members of the GOP; it’s just that the GOP has learned how to tailor its message to religious voters better than the Democrats have.
Well, for starters, I was one of those weekly-attending non-Latino Catholics who voted for John Kerry in 2004. During that election season (when, as you may recall, I was living in the bluest of blue states) I endured more than my fair share of small-minded talk about “red states” and the backwardness of “values voters” from well-meaning acquaintances who didn’t realize how judgmental they sounded. I didn’t let it dampen my enthusiasm for politics, however, although this election season, as partisan attacks on both sides (and again, I’m not talking about Democratic candidates here – I’m talking about Regular Joe and Jane Democrat, sitting at home at their computers) have escalated, I’ve found myself more and more often being insulted by the very people with whom I’m supposed to be agreeing. (In case you’re wondering, this was what finally put me over the top. Not the post itself – that was well-put – but a number of the reader comments.)
I was venting to MLB about this the other night, and he couldn’t seem to understand why I was so upset.
“They’re not talking about you,” he said. “They’re talking about people who give Christians a bad name. You should be mad at those Christians, not at the people who criticize them.”
“I’m mad at all of them,” I said. “It’s an unfair generalization. Most Christians aren’t narrow-minded jerks, and it’s not fair to talk about us all that way.”
“I just don’t see why it upsets you. They’re not talking about you.”
“How about this,” I said. “You know how you get upset when people in the crowd at McCain/Palin rallies yell things about Obama being a Muslim terrorist?”
“Yeah?”
“Well, they’re not talking about you, so why do you let that upset you?”
“Because it’s wrong, and it’s hurtful, and…” his voice trailed off. “Oh.”
“Thank you,” I said.
Here’s the thing, my blue-voter friends: Some of the things some of you are saying about Christians are remarks that, were you to substitute another word for Christian – say, I don’t know, Muslim or black or woman or Jew, for example – could be categorized as what one might call “hate speech.” In fact, some of you making those remarks about Christians would be the first to jump down the throat of someone making similar remarks about Muslims or African-Americans or women or Jews. Double standard much?
Besides, these people you’re criticizing – the ones who won’t vote for Obama because he’s black, or his middle name is Hussein, or who think all Muslims are evil – the problem isn’t that they’re Christians. The problem is that they’re ignorant, or ill-informed, or hypocritical, or just hateful. And they use their religion as a front for their ignorance or lack of information or hypocrisy or hatred. What they’re saying has nothing to do with Jesus. So criticize them for being ignorant or ill-informed or hypocritical or hateful. But don’t criticize them for being Christians. Because when you defame Christians, you’re defaming me and a lot of other good people – Democrat, Republican, third-party and independent alike.
It’s time to reprogram. You know how when people make remarks about terrorists and they just say “Muslims,” you want to correct them and make them clarify that they’re talking about “Islamic extremist terrorists who are not representative of the vast majority of the peaceful followers of Islam”? It’s time for American progressives to do the same thing. Only you’re not talking about “Christians,” you’re talking about “ignorant, ill-informed Americans who use Christianity as a foil to mask their own personal prejudices.”
And in case that doesn’t convince you, here are a few other people you might want to keep in mind you’re including when you talk smack about “Christians”:






19 smart remarks:
[applauding you, again] beautifully put. your students are so very fortunate!
Thank you so much for that. Seriously. I had TOTALLY FORGOTTEN ABOUT PIG-PONG!!!
Remember how complicated the balls were? You had to have, like, an engineering degree to put them together. Do we still have that?
Very well put, Maia. And I know I myself am guilty of such narrow-minded generalizations sometimes (just today, I wanted to collectively smack the Mormons for pouring millions and millions of dollars into codifying discrimination into the California constitution, even though I know it's not ALL Mormons...).
I think much of the problem is that it is so often the extremists (whether its Christian, Muslim, feminist, whatever) who become the voice of a much larger group, even if the larger groups doesn't hold the same extremist beliefs. We all know that most Christians are good people, just like most people in general are good people. But somehow the James Dobsons and Sarah Palins of the world have come to signify "Christian" to a lot of people.
I thought of you today while reading an op-ed in the Washington Post about the growing number of Catholics who are deciding that while abortion may be an important issue, it might not be the only issue, and are swinging towards Obama.
I hope, in my sometimes over-enthusiastic and bull-headed rants, that I have not offended you (too much...).
Love you, Maia, and thanks for this well-written reminder that we could all stand to be a little more open-minded.
I'll lay off the Xtians when the ignorant Xtians lay off everybody BUT THEM. As an awake and aware Buddhist I fully realize that not all Xtians are idiots, but many have lost their sanity due to fundamentalism akin to the Taliban itself. Really, Amy? Really! Yes, really.
Those Xtians keep forgetting "render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's..." and "the kingdom of heaven is not of this earth...", not to mention "love thy neighbor as one would love themselves..." or "do unto other as you would have done to yourself". The sanctimony and self-righteousness of some of these people is a the very least irritating and at worst an absolute repudiation of Xtianity itself. Love and tolerance was Jesus' message and unfortunately many have strayed from the core message.
Time for all to embrace awareness and STOP operating on autopilot. Even Xtians. Wake up!
-Laz
http://omfgalaska.blogspot.com/
I am sorry you are feeling attacked by those who should be your allies. I wonder, though, if the problem is that this country seems to think a person's religious beliefs are anyone else's business.
I don't understand why such an intensely private topic is part of the national discourse at all.
The worthiest of axes. On a related note, see George Washington's letter to the Jewish community of Newport, RI... http://gwpapers.virginia.edu/documents/hebrew/reply.html
Laz,
You appear to have missed my point completely. Like I said, criticize those Christians for being ignorant — not for being Christian. Christianity isn't what makes them ignorant. It's just a conduit for their ignorance.
And Em, you could never offend me too much. Mostly because I love you.
Thanks for the great post! My friend, Sig, forwarded the link to me, knowing I share your anguish over this issue. For so long I thought maybe I was being over sensitive, but really I don't offend all that easy! The Christian bashing has gone too far lately and now I'm sure it's not just me being over sensitive. It really bothers me that a few hard core fanatics ruin everyone's perspective on the matter of religion - especially 'Christian religion.'
I should be in bed at this hour and have been MIA on the interwebs for weeks but wanted to reply to this (and I apologize if I get a little convoluted).
Although I was raised Catholic, I do not "identify" with most of the faith-based/Protestant movements in this country (whether they are 'connected' the the GOP or the Dems). My big beef is this ... if you're a Christian, act it. Being a Christian does not simply mean you believe Christ existed. I know Nutella exists. This doesn't make me a Nutellian. If you are going to get all preachy, then live it, show me, do it. And maybe you should be a pastor, not a politician.
I do not "pigeon hole' all Christians that believe one way or the other. However, I get hot under the collar when someone decides to make their FAITH a political platform issue (*ahem* Bush) and doesn't show but a mere sign of living life as a Christian, behaving in any way that resembles what Christ taught us, etc.
And ... What in God's name happened to the separation of church and state? Since when does religion play a role in politics? Why have politicians DRAGGED god, church and their faith into the White House, Senate races, etc?
And why oh why are you ignoring the fact that I hear on an almost daily basis that "Democrats are Godless heathens who do not respect faith and want us to abandon the bible". For some reason (*ahem* Bush) the GOP and their constituents are church-going and the rest of us are devil worshipers. I'm sorry ... come again? Cause you've heard this right?
So you're upset that you're "people", the Democrats, say the "Christians" are ruining things for us in America and are bad mouthing Christians? Honey, the mud slinging goes both ways and the ONLY people you have to thank for it are those that have made faith an issue when it has zero, and I mean absolutely zero, place in a house of governance.
Shouldn't the cruxt of this argument be about people who aren't living a good Christian life or those who give Christians a bad name, as MLB says. I don't understand why you aren't upset at THEM rather at the people attacking your faith. (This is sounding rather circular, I apologize).
My point is, I don't look at George Bush and say, "He and ALL Christians are awful people." What I say is, "I'd really like to know what church he goes to and what kinda values he was taught cause somebody messed up somewhere." (Yes I live in the same town as he and no, he doesn't go to church). Should't YOU defend your faith and say, "Wait a minute ..... I don't want you 'representing' my faith. You don't stand for nor practice the basic tenets of what this faith was founded on." Is it not EVERY Christian's place to say, ... "Wait just a minute!!!! Give me back my faith, you low-life sleazy pandering politician that has ruined it for us real faithful people." Is it not??
~~~~~~
So I don't care if you're militant or orthodox or reform or worship a stuffed duck ... if you do it, be consistent. Live a life that you PREACH! If that's what you believe.
And maybe one day the rest of this nation can remember the constitution and the declaration of independence and the bill of rights and all that shit and get back to running this joint. And in our SEPARATE time we can all worship whoever we want, whenever we want, however we want.
*sigh*
Thanks for the responses. Couple things:
• I think I'm pretty clear on the fact that there are some Christians who are ruining it for the rest of us, and I'm not happy with them. My argument is that that doesn't give anyone an excuse to say nasty things about all Christians.
• Of course religion doesn't belong in politics. But many voters (most voters, if the statistics are correct) are religious, and many of our votes (mine included) are influenced by our beliefs. I vote my values; I just don't share the same values as "values voters" who are going to vote McCain/Palin.
• I do mention the party's perceived "God problem" in the post, and the fact that politics has been hijacked by right-wing fundamentalists. (Well, OK, I say the GOP specifically has been hijacked.)
• Believe me when I say I resent the hijacking of the name of Christianity. I do. But that's not what I'm talking about here. I'm talking about people who know better making gross generalizations. About 80% of the country. And I don't mean people who specifically complain about fundamentalist bigots (I do that too). I mean people who lump all Christians together. Again, 80% of Americans identify themselves as some kind of Christian. The importance is making the distinction, just as it's important to make the distinction between peaceful followers of Islam and radical Muslim fundamentalists who blow up civilians. All I'm asking is that I (and the other sane Christians who mind our own business where religion is concerned) not get tossed in with the wingnuts who use Jesus as a flimsy excuse to hate gay people.
• Anyone who doesn't think I have strong feelings about the people giving Christians a bad name should Google me. First name Maia, last name Nolan. Better yet, Google the name of my religion, the word that means a heavy thing that holds a boat in place, and the word "editor." The easiest hit is at C@thol!c World "News," but I'm kind of partial to the comments on Free Republic myself, although they may take some digging to get to.
First of all, why the hell are you all getting her in a bad mood as we are literally walking out the door to Vegas. Harsh my mellow much?
In seriousness, as the warden would say in Cool Hand Luke, "no man can eat 50 eggs." By which I mean I think people are largely talking past each other, in large part due to the difference between the normal and colloquial usage of terms such as "values" or "religious" voters. I mean, obviously Maia is both in one sense and neither in the other.
But what do I know, I'm neither in either sense...
I think the point that painting all people of a certain faith with a broad brush is not a good idea is well taken. Unless we're talking about Scientologists.
I suggest you go read this article on privilege. Christians are the privileged religious group in this country.
How is it that you can rant so clearly and with so much focus? My rants come out like this: Hey! ARGGGHHH!
It is sad that most every brush stroke is broad. I prefer a meritocracy where character and actions rule the day.
But, then again, I am not religious. I am "spiritual." ;^)
So...I'm a Christian and a Republican, and I want to know-- When are you going to run for office?
I read part of this post earlier in the week, but just now I was reading about OPEC and oil prices and the Western nations' reactions to that. It made me think of you, cause as I read your posts, you and I have very different backgrounds, but I can still find things that I agree with you about. Think how much stronger America might be if we could focus on the things we agree on more than the things we disagree on.
Anyway, Keep up the good work. Maia 2016.
Oy vey, Maia I just re-read my words and need to make a clarification. I adore you and have been reading for a while and am happy to be a part of your network here. Like you, religion and politics (as they intersect and as separate issues) get me really fired up. So just to clarify, all of my "you"s in my previous comment were "universal you"s and not you = Maia. Oh sometimes I hate the interwebs. Your post was spot-on and it cause me to get all ranty and I was kinda just shouting out at a*holes, not at you, I PROMISE!
We are talking at each other cause I think we totally agree.
Ok, glad that's all cleared up ...
I'll run in 2016, but only as a third-party candidate. We'll call it the Sidewalk Party. K-stin can be my running mate and LilSass will be Secretary of State. We won't need a press representative. My first official action will be to declare a national holiday on Mark Begich's birthday.
Awesome! I hope our party will let me have a shopping spree!
Here here K-stin! This lady over here could really use a makeover and I think the GOP should pay for it, even if we aren't members of their party.
Secretary of State? Man, I don't even think I know what the SoS does, but .... can I "be in charge of the Senate" like Palin? Mwah mwah mwah!!
Post a Comment